"Screw you" money

Have you ever heard the term "screw you" money, or some variation thereof?  Probably not, since it's not generally used in polite company.  But you probably understand the concept, and it's something you definitely need.  "Screw you money" is having enough money to be able to tell almost anyone to fuck off.  Most people would call it financial independence.

Is your boss a jerk?  Do you hate your job?  Legal troubles?  Medical issues?  Creditors?  There are very few situations in life where having enough money wouldn't remedy your problems and make you not have to kiss anyone's ass.

You need this, because the most important thing money can buy is freedom.  Freedom from a toxic work environment, a crappy neighborhood, crushing debt.  Freedom to do what you want (within reason) and pursue your passions.

Those who live paycheck to paycheck are slaves.  Those who carry debt are slaves.  You need to get out of debt, and work on having enough money to not have to work if you find yourself unwilling or unable to.

What would happen if you lost your job and couldn't find another one?  What if for some reason you didn't qualify for welfare, unemployment, or any other kind of assistance?  I've been in both situations and it's terrifying.  Too many people spend their entire paycheck on frivolous bullshit because they think they'll always have one, or if they lose their job, they'll be able to find another one.

The concept of "screw you" money is very appealing, but most people think they'll never be able to have it, unless they win the lottery or something.  I'm here to tell you that's not true.  As I've mentioned before, all you really need to do is save up enough money so that when properly invested, it's producing enough income to last you for the rest of your life, a self-sustaining "fuck you" fusion reactor, if you will.

Like this, but like, throwing off money instead of heat and radiation

You may also think you need an amount greater than you'll ever be able to save, but that's also not true.  All you really need to last you forever is 25 times your annual desired expenses.  So say you wanted to retire today with an $80,000 annual salary for the rest of your life (which would increase with inflation, so you can buy the same amount of stuff today as in 50 years), you'd multiply that $80k by 25, and it gives you $2 million.  All you'd need is $2 million dollars.

Alright, so maybe that's a lot. But say you lower your expenses a bit, to $30k a year (which is very doable, depending on where you live).  You would only need $750,000 invested in the stock market to throw off $30k in today's dollars for the rest of your life.  You could walk out of your office proudly baring the one finger salute, and never have to work again, as long as you maintain your standard of living.

Here's John Goodman explaining the concept.  In case this gets removed from Youtube or something, it's from "The Gambler."  The position of fuck you:

To place yourself in the position of "fuck you" it's important to start early, save as much as possible, and invest it.  There are many people who have retired super early.  You do not have to work until you're 65.  I'm currently working on my "screw you" money, and as long as things go according to plan, I'll be financially independent by 45 or so.  Maybe earlier, though I doubt I'll stop working.  It'll just be nice to be able to finally relax and free myself of the worry that comes with poverty,  I've encountered some setbacks in life that have left me cynical but realistic, and have shown me how truly necessary financial independence is.

I hope you get it too.

Life insurance example

I've previously talked about the different kinds of life insurance and how term is best for most people.  I say most because I'm sure there are people out there who could benefit from the other kinds.  Getting to the point of this post, here's an illustration of a real insurance policy one of my friends was kind enough to share with me.  Obviously, the name and information of the person and the company have been redacted for privacy, and so the company doesn't sue me or whatever, but I've circled the points I'd like to draw your attention to.

This particular policy is a variable life insurance policy, which is a permanent life insurance policy with an investment component.  The policy has a cash value account, which is invested in a number of accounts similar to mutual funds.

Now that you've all snoozed off, allow me to put that in plain English.  Not only do your dependents get paid a bunch of money if you die (like a regular life insurance policy), but the insurance company helpfully invests your premiums for you, and you don't even have to croak to get paid!  How fucking cool is that?

"Of course, it costs a little more, but it's worth it."  
"What was that?"

"Oh, I was just mumbling that it costs a little bit more that term, but let me redirect your attention to something else."

"Wait, how much extra?"

"Ah, don't you worry yourself about that.  It's worth it.  Let me just dazzle you with a bunch of figures."

That's the gist of the spiel most insurance salesmen (or women, whatever, I'm equal opportunity) will run by you, and to the uninformed schmuck, it sounds awesome.  And it IS all fine and dandy, except for one crucial point they tend not to cover - these policies charge fees; a lot of them.

This particular policy you can see above was purchased at the beginning of November 2007, when the insured was 19 years old, for a death benefit of $400,000.  The monthly premiums are $116.50, and the current cash out value is just over $5,200.  To put that into perspective, a term policy for the same amount costs maybe $25 a month.  To date (11/2007 - 09/2015), this person has paid out $11,067.50 in premiums.

Did you notice the difference between the cash value and what was paid?  It's less than half.  That's not even taking into account the stock market returns.  Let's pretend this same person had purchased that $400,000 term life insurance policy for $25 a month, and invested the remaining $91.50 in an S&P 500 index fund.  The cash value today would be just over $12,000.

In summary, you're probably throwing your money away if you purchase anything other than a term life insurance policy.  If someone is trying really hard to sell you something (other than advice), they're not doing it to help you out.  They're doing it because it's lucrative.  And more fees for them equals more costs for you.

And they'll probably say something like this as well

Now for the obligatory disclaimer: I'm not a licensed financial anything (yet) so I can't legally give you advice for money.  This is all my opinion, and if you take my advice, that's on you.  However, licensed advisors like Dave Ramsey and Suze Orman (and pretty much anyone not trying to sell you a product) tend to agree with me.

Keep your nose to the grindstone

In March 2010, I became debt-free.  I had already been making small contributions to my retirement accounts for the previous 4 years, so I wasn't starting at zero.  Best I can tell, I had about $5,000 in my Thrift Savings Plan when I paid off the last of my credit cards and my car loan.

So little work actually goes into successful investing, people who aren't in the right mindset will think you're lying.  The key is to set aside as much money as possible from your paycheck BEFORE you receive it and have a chance to spend it.  People call this "paying yourself first."  If you're in debt, that money should go towards ensuring your freedom from bad debt, and if you're out of debt, that money should go towards your future financial freedom.

UPS hired me last December, and I started out making $10 an hour.  I quickly did what I could to learn a skill (sorting by zip codes), which got me another dollar an hour.  For the first seven months I was there, I was making roughly $800 a month after taxes.  Since my rent is $500 a month, and food is included, you'll probably guess living on $800 a month is possible, but not very pleasant.  You'd be right.  I did manage to survive on that money without having to dip into my savings, but only because I did absolutely nothing.  I went nowhere, and only bought the absolute necessities, taking the bus to save on gas sometimes.  Every additional penny spent was scrutinized for practicality and necessity.

Many people in my position would have gone ahead and used their savings to maintain their "quality of life," but I was determined not to cheat my future self.  I also knew that this low level of pay was merely temporary until I could land a better position.  That position ended up being part-time supervisor, which effectively doubled my salary.  As you can see from a quick calculation, it's still not very much, but I now had enough money to buy myself small luxuries such as fast food and hour-long leisure drives to visit friends without having to really worry about spending more than I earned.

I also now had extra money with which I could fund my retirement, so I opened a Roth 401(k) and set aside 10% of my income to go towards that.  This is money that would get pulled out before I got my paycheck, so I wouldn't have an opportunity to miss it.  To many people, 10% may seem like a lot, but keep in mind my paycheck was still 80% higher than just a few months prior.  If I could survive on $800 a month, $1,440 would still be a fantastic raise.

Now we come to the main point of this post.  After I realized that I was still doing fine on a 10% contribution rate, I increased it to 15%, then 20%.  Every time, I would wait a month or two and see if my living expenses were covered.  What you want to do is drive up your savings rate until it hurts, then ease back just a little.

At work, I encourage many of my co-workers to start saving, especially the younger ones.  They don't really listen, because at 21, all you really care about is having fun, not thinking about the future.  Putting money in a retirement account means less money you can spend on awesome stuff today.  And even if they don't spend very much, there's always an excuse as to why they can't start right now.  They're content just coasting.  I am not.

I make no excuses.  I just do it.  My 401(k) currently sits at $1,460 or so, including the 3% matching contribution that UPS gives us.  That's $1,460 more than my co-workers have saved.  We both started at zero, but I bought one less restaurant meal, or went on one less trip, and instead put that money to work for me.

You can too.  Start saving today.  You'll be amazed at how little you can live on when your priorities are straight.

Successful investing

Recently, the stock market took a pretty big dive. Plenty of people thought this was The End. The start of another Recession. You should have bought gold when Glenn Beck yelled at you. The market hit a peak in May, then dropped over 10%, and bottomed out on August 25. Since then, it's been steadily going up. How many of you panicked and sold?  In the grand scheme of things, this is an insignificant blip you won't remember. The stock market tumbled in October of 2011; how many of you remember that?

Let's pretend you regularly check your portfolio. Let's also assume you decided you wanted to take a vacation from it all and go camping or out to sea for 7 months or so, leaving the day before the market started tanking. During your time away, you had no internet access and couldn't check your portfolio. When you come back in December or January, you open up your account and notice it's slightly higher than when you left. Not by very much, but still in line with the gradual upward trend of the market over time. Nothing to see here. You shrug, close your computer, and go about your day as usual. And unless someone said something, you would have had no idea there was a small crisis in your absence.

That beard has got to go before you go back to work

The best investors keep their cool. They have a solid, SIMPLE plan, and know that stocks aren't something to buy and sell, but rather portions of ownership of real businesses. Businesses that produce things, that earn money, that keep the economy going. Good investors view stocks like most people would view investment real estate. Would you buy an apartment building just so you can sell it a year later and collect the profit? Probably not. Most people would buy it so they could collect rent and eventually have it as a source of passive income so they don't have to work any more.

In the same way, good investors buy business ownership for the long run. There are some people that try to make money by buying and selling stocks or real estate.  Most people that try to time the market end up broke.  A handful, either through luck or skill, do extraordinarily well, which fuel the dreams and ambitions of those trying to emulate them with little hope.  During the real estate bubble, millions of people bought properties with the goal of capitalizing on the market increases. Those who sold before the bubble burst were either lucky or smart.  Some people get lucky with risk. Statistically, you're probably not one of them.

Don't try to time the market. Buy businesses that your research shows will do well over the next few decades, invest regularly and hold on to them. If you don't know how to research a business, buy an index.  History shows us that the market returns a decent 8% return in an average year. Sure, there will always be someone making more money than you, but THEY AREN'T YOU. And chances are, if they're making lot more money than the market, they're taking on foolish risks that will eventually bite them in the ass. Steer clear of get rich quick schemes and keep it simple.

The wisdom (and foolishness) of crowds

In 1906, a British smart guy named Francis Galton attended a fair and there was a contest where people would try to guess the weight of an ox. Being a statistician (and therefore presumably single), he wondered how the crowd as a whole would do, and he figured that since most of them were not experts in cow-related matters (no, their wives don't count), they'd probably come up with something laughably wrong.

The ox ended up weighing 1,198 lbs.  The average of the answers the crowd came up with was 1,197 lbs, which means that the collective guess of those amateurs was only a pound off.

NPR recently replicated the experiment and uploaded a photo to the internet, asking people to guess the weight of a cow named Penelope.  Over 17,000 people submitted guesses.  The actual cow weighed 1,355 lbs, and the average guess was 1,287 lbs.  Not as close as the original, but still less than 5% off.  Of the respondents, 3,000 were "experts," people who knew a little something about cows, and their average was 1,272.  That's right, the self-proclaimed experts actually did worse than people who knew nothing about cows.  Not by much, but still.

While at the fair, they asked a group of kids how much they thought the cow weighed, and after the first one said 200 pounds (because kids are stupid), the others followed suit and gave answers that were pretty close.  Now, I'm tempted to attribute that to the stupidity of children as well, but adults do that too.  It's what's called "information cascade," and it happens because people instinctively look to leaders.  They assume since someone already blurted out an answer with some confidence, they must know what they're talking about.

There were a handful of people who guessed the exact weight, and the guys at NPR called up one of them at random, who turned out to be a 20 year old college student, who came up with the answer via the very scientific method of "googling that shit."  His extensive 90-second research told him that the average weight of a cow was 1500 lbs, and by comparing the provided picture of Your Mom with the picture of Penelope, he correctly guessed she weighed 1355.

The two points I'm making here are that the crowd tends to do better than the experts at predicting things, as long as they aren't swayed by the decisions of those around them (like the kids were, by that first little dummy), and that just because someone gets the right answer once, it doesn't mean they will be able to do it again.

In the same vein, if left to its own devices, the stock market tends to be a very good indicator of the actual value of a stock.  Investors are irrational, but collectively, they tend to arrive at a price that's pretty close to what it's actually worth, as long as they aren't swayed by "experts" or TV personalities who talk about this or that stock or investment.

That's also why it's so hard to beat the stock market.  The wisdom of the crowd is pretty good, and the people who beat it are often just lucky.  Remember the cow experts who did worse than the average non-expert at guessing the weight?  Financial experts like money managers tend to do the same with investments.  More often than not, they actually underperform.  Four out of five do worse than the market over a 20-year time period.

Now, the principle of crowd wisdom doesn't really hold when a certain investment is highly visible and when investors are influenced by others.  When people see everyone is piling into a certain stock, they think that it must be a good investment, so they do as well.  Then bubbles and panics happen:

Remember bitcoin?  The real estate market? Fuckin' Beanie Babies?

Chances are, once you hear about something hot, it's probably too late.  That was the case with bitcoin, the real estate market, you name it.  By the time the media reports on it, the smart people have made their money and will soon be pulling it out.  Of course, there is that 20% of experts and money managers who actually do better than the market, and those genius investors like Warren Buffett and Peter Lynch, who have 9- or 10-figure net worths, but good luck with that.  Your best bet as a novice investor (as I would assume most of the people reading this to be) is to ignore the chatter and not try to go for whatever the hot investment is at the moment.  Instead, you'll be better off by investing regularly in a low-fee index fund.  To read more about cows, crowds and averages, check out this article.

Good credit

A few years ago, before I really got into finance, I was in line at a Walmart, listening to a lady talking to her friend about going through the process of getting a house built by Habitat for Humanity.  These houses are built with donated labor and some donated materials, and the lucky homeowner generally pays a fraction of what they would if they had to buy it on the market.

She was worried that she might not qualify due to her poor credit, and didn't know what to do.  I helpfully chimed in that if she wanted to raise her credit score, all she had to do was make her payments on time.  

She scoffed, as if that was something that would never happen, and it dawned on me that not everyone had the same attitude towards debt as I did (namely, that it's bad, and you should try to stay away from it as much as possible, especially consumer debt).

I entered the military with about $4,500 in credit card debt and a credit score of about 580.  The debt was not, as you might think, from stupid purchases.  In fact, most of it was from necessities, such as gas and groceries.  I was just not making enough to get by, and racked up debt just to survive.  Of course, at the time, my money management skills were pretty bad.  

When I finally got a steady paycheck, one of my first priorities was paying off my debt, and I was surprised to see my score jump to 630 within a few months.  I was still in debt, but no longer maxed out, and making regular payments that were more than the minimums required.

For the past few years, my credit score has been around 750, which I thought was pretty good, but I was kind of disappointed it never went higher.  However, a few months ago, I was astounded to see it hit 810, presumably because I had crossed some mythical length of credit history. In fact, this is probably the highest my credit score can possibly go without a mortgage.  The highest is 850, in case you were wondering.

In case you thought I was lying

Here are the factors that play a role in your credit score:

1) Percentage of the limit used: 10% or less in generally best.  So if your credit cards have a $10,000 total limit, you want to have no more than $1,000 on there at any one time.  Higher is ok, but I wouldn't recommend having more than 50% of your limit in use.  I'm usually at 1-3%, because I spend very little, and pay it off in full every month.

2) Payment history: they want to know if you make your payments on time.  Never, EVER pay stuff late.  I never have, so my payment history is 100%.

These two are the most important things that go into your credit score.  There are people who are millions of dollars in debt, but still have great credit scores because their debt doesn't exceed a certain portion of their limit, and they always pay at least the minimums on time.

3) Derogatory marks: basically, if you have accounts in collections (if you haven't paid for a few months, it tends to go to collections), bankruptcies, etc.  If you pay on time, this one is irrelevant.

4) Age of credit history.  Never close the first card you ever got.

5) Total accounts: they want to see you make good on paying loans back on several accounts.  This includes accounts that have been closed.  I have 16, including old car loans, closed credit cards, and three cards that I still have open.  It's recommended you have at least 2 credit cards open.

6) Credit inquiries: every time you apply for a loan, they make what's called a "hard inquiry."

So in summary, for good credit, keep your debt to under 50% (preferably 10%) of your limit, and always make your payments on time.

The lottery

In 2002, a man named Jack Whittaker won over $300 million in the lottery. He was already a millionaire at the time, but like many other lottery winners, his life took a turn for the worse. He did donate 10% to churches and even more to charity, but he had a bad habit of leaving cash in his car and getting it stolen, he blew a lot of it on casinos, his house got robbed, and his granddaughter got killed, presumably for drugs or money.

I was surprised when I read it because rich people seldom play the lottery (except when the prize is high, and I'll get into that in a minute). Especially someone like him.  Jack lived simply.  Not many people knew he was wealthy. Self-made rich people tend to be very calculating with their money and know that the probability of winning is so low as to be non-existent. You'd be much better off just putting the money in a savings account. One reason most lottery winners tend to lose all their money within 3 years is that they overspend. Friends and strangers ask them for money, and many oblige. They buy luxury stuff that only makes them happy briefly. It strains their relationships.

Do you know what the difference is between someone who made $30 million and someone who won it? The first had to work for his/her money and the second was simply given it. Money you earn is much more difficult to part with.

Poor people play the lottery regularly, while rich people are more calculating and only tend to play when the prize is very large: http://www.businessinsider.com/how-rich-people-and-poor-people-play-the-lottery-2012-3

I still buy a lottery ticket every now and then, in spite of knowing that the lottery is a "stupid tax". If you ever win, make sure you set aside a good portion of it into low-cost investments (diversified index funds are my suggestion), and feel free to splurge the rest. Just make sure you can actually cover the whole cost of that house/car/island with the remainder and not have to dip into your investments.

Fitness

You know what I'm into?  Fitness.  As in, fitness whole burger in my mouth.

Lol, so punny

On a serious note, fitness is extremely important, not just for your health, but also for looks.  A fit girl with an ugly face will almost always be considered more attractive than a fat girl with a pretty face.  That's because something like 90% of looking attractive is about being fit.  I don’t see it so often here in California because people are more image-conscious, but in Georgia, I’d often see fat girls plastered in makeup or with a deep tan because they thought it would make them look pretty.  As the old saying goes, you can’t put lipstick on a pig.

Oh, wait

What people fail to realize is, like a lot of things, fitness doesn't happen overnight.  (Except when I go for fit'ness burger in my mouth.  That I can do in like a minute.)  You need to take small steps.  People who only work out 10 minutes a day but stick to it for several months will see better results than those who go hard once or twice a week.

Cutting back on sugar also helps tremendously.  For the past decade, my weight would fluctuate between 180 and 195 lbs.  I thought I was pretty fit, but I did have a little chub.  A few months ago, I took some medication that had a side effect of appetite suppression, which helped me to lose about 20 lbs.  So there I am at 165, feeling better than I had in years, and I decided to keep the weight off.  So far, I've managed to stay under 170, and it feels good.

I'm 5'10, by the way.

So in summary, stop whining about being fat, work out REGULARLY (even if it's just walking around the block), eat less, cut out sugars and be patient!

Also, if you're a girl, use the time you spend tanning to work out.  

Rappers and wealth

I was at a hookah bar in Temecula last night with a couple of friends from work, and they had a 300-inch TV on the wall playing hip-hop videos.  We watched it for an hour or so, providing commentary the entire time.

Every now and again, I'd see a rapper I'd never heard of come up flaunting his wealth in the form of cars, jewelry and houses, and I wondered how much he was worth.  So I looked him up.

I discovered that the lower the rapper's net worth was, the more he tended to flash.  Case in point; Young Thug.

I'd never heard of him, and the mumbling that passes for rap in this video means his career will last about as long as Sisqo's.  If you don't know who that is, don't worry.  The kids these days don't either.  He had his 15 minutes of fame in the early 2000's.

What about Soulja Boy, remember him?

He came to prominence in 2008-ish and faded like a particularly noxious fart in the wind.

Anyway, Young Thug's net worth is $500,000.  Half a million. Like, he probably wears a third of that around his neck.  On the opposite end of the spectrum, take a look at Diddy and Dr. Dre.  When was the last time you saw them flashing anything in their music videos?  A couple of decades ago, maybe?  That's because they don't have to. They are worth about $700 million each, easily making them the richest men in hip hop.

T.I. used to be all about the bling, but he's toned it down somewhat, and for good reason.  He's worth $50 million.



Then there's Rick Ross, who's still into showing off, but he's only worth $35 million

I wonder if he has tattoos under his tits

I'm not saying that you shouldn't buy flashy stuff if you have the money.  All I'm saying is that most people who feel the need to show off, tend not to be that rich.  An inferiority complex, if you will, kind of like how people with small dicks tend to drive Hummers and purchase large firearms.

Dan Bilzerian, in case you weren't aware

There's a big difference between being wealthy and rich.  Wealthy people think about the future and have no need to prove to others how rich they are.  Warren Buffett is one of the richest people in the world (worth over $70 billion), and he drives a 15-year old car.

Your face when you realize your $25 million ain't shit

What the hell?

Today, I experienced two things that left me flabbergasted

This was roughly my expression

I was at the gym, watching CNN in between sets, and the news ticker at the bottom was saying that in Kansas, welfare recipients may have to pay for "tattoos, tobacco and fortune tellers" out of their own pocket. As in, they're currently using taxpayer dollars for those things. 

Movies were also included, but that's a quality of life thing, so I won't complain about that.

On the way back home, I was listening to the radio, and an ad came on for a Duck Dynasty musical. Duck Dynasty is purportedly about "faith, family and food" but it's just a reality TV show about a rich redneck family that makes duck calls.

When I heard there was going to be a musical, I almost crashed.  There's a freaking musical? Why is that stupid show still around?

Anyway, what I'd like you all to get from this rant is this: I've been hitting the gym, so get at me, ladies.

Personal loans

Lending money has always been a tricky endeavor.  For one thing, you don't know if the person will pay you back, and if they don't, it may strain your relationship.  It's always best to give money to people without the expectation of ever seeing it again.  You'll be happier that way.

A few years ago, in 2011, an acquaintance of mine called me up and asked me to loan him $1,000.  I always try to help people whenever I can, be it helping them move, tutoring them, or giving them money, and since I had a good salary and substantial savings, I agreed immediately.

He said he needed to go to a funeral or something.  I think he was surprised I had agreed so readily, because he then said "Well, actually, can I borrow $1,100?"

"Sure, no problem," I said.

Then he asked me to wire him the money, as he needed it ASAP.  It would have taken a day or two for a check to reach him by mail, as I was in Georgia and he in North Carolina, but whatever.  He needed it now.  So I spent $20 to send it via Western Union.

He swore up and down he'd pay me back, and being the naive person I am, I trusted him.  The first payment of $100 came about 6 weeks later, when he was in town, and I got it without a problem.  After that, I had to send him repeat reminders to get anything.  And it was like pulling teeth.

Now, all this wouldn't have been so bad if he were in a bad financial position.  I've loaned money to people who promised they'd pay me back in 3 months, and it ended up being eight, but I sympathized because they truly didn't have any money.  I've been there, and it sucks.  I totally understand.  Plus, they actually tried to pay me back ASAP.

What bothered me wasn't the fact that this fool had a job that paid well.  Or that it was taking a lot longer than he'd promised.  What bothered the shit out of me (and I'm sure you all can sympathize) is when I'd go on facebook and there would be a post on his wall saying how much fun he was having traveling around, visiting friends, club-hopping, going out to eat or for drinks, or even gloating about a watch he'd just purchased.  Those outings were probably setting him back at least $50 a night.  Fifty motherfucking dollars he could have been using to pay me back.

A few weeks after the first payment, when I still thought he'd be paying me back regularly, he called me and asked if I could co-sign with him on an apartment lease.  I almost would have, too, if I hadn't remembered a conversation I had with someone just a few days prior, in which they told me that they readily give money to friends and family, but will never loan their credit.  I politely refused, and it's a good thing I did, as he ended up losing the apartment.

You may be wondering why I helped him.  I'm naive and very trusting, and I tend to believe people are generally good and will do what they say.

Over the next 18 months, I got back a total of $700, culminating in a phone call in October of 2012 where he asked me how much he still owed me.  I said $400.

Him: "Really?  I thought it was $350"

Me: "No, it's $400"

Plus that 20 I had to spend to send you the money, dipshit

Him: "Are you sure?  I thought it was $350"

Me: "You know what?  If you just send me $200 by November, we can call it good."

Him: "Really?  That's great, thanks so much.  I'll be sure to send it to you.  Thanks, man."

You can probably guess that I received precisely zero dollars the following month.  I never heard from him again, and we are no longer friends.

On the plus side, he'll never ask me for money again.

Yaaay.

Making ends meet

You know that saying "When you make ends meet, they move the ends"?  Or "why is there always so much month left at the end of my money"?  For many people, not making enough is a harsh reality.

A reality that became mine after getting out of the Air Force.  For eight years, I made more than I needed, and managed to save a bunch, so I am technically not in the same boat as the individuals described above.

However, my income is currently woefully inadequate.  I got hired on by UPS at the beginning of December, and I've been making $750 a month.  Fortunately, my recurring expenses are low, but there are always unexpected ones.  The last time I was in this boat was in 2005, when I was making about the same, and I thought how wonderful it would be if I could just make enough to have a bit left over after paying all the bills.

I now find myself calculating mileages, between work and home, and other locations I frequent, such as the gym, to see whether it would be better to go home for free dinner after school, or get something off the dollar menu at McDonalds before going to work.

The silver lining is that I do have money I can draw from, though I'm staunchly resolute not to do so unless it can't be helped; and also, there will be future opportunities to move up at work, and regular (shitty) raises.  A couple of weeks after I started, I found out that if I memorized a bunch of zip codes, I'd have an opportunity to do a job paying me a dollar extra an hour, which may not seem like much, but everything adds up.  So I took the test and I'm currently making $11/hr.

As soon as they let me, I'll be applying for a management position, and at that point I'll be making enough to start being able to put extra money away in my retirement accounts again.

Fortunately, the military is paying for my books and tuition, but parking at the college is fucking ridiculous.  Last semester, I paid $338 for parking.  That breaks down to over $21 a week.  And I was only there twice a week.

Anyway, I'm thankful I actually have a job, financial knowledge, and a solid nest egg.  So many others don't.