New York passed gay marriage yesterday, becoming the sixth state (plus DC, though they don't really count. "Taxation without representation" and all that. It's even on their licence plates. Why would they even advertise that? But I'm rambling. Here's the rest of the sentence) to do so. First of all, I think many, if not all of the rights afforded to straight couples should have been given to gays a long time ago, and withholding them is just stupid. Hospital rights, inheritance and military service are a few of the things that come to mind. Many on the religious right would argue that homosexuality is wrong, period, and while I personally am not comfortable with the thought of two sweaty dudes going at it, the morality of it is not where my beef lies.
 |
| Though this is pretty much wrong no matter who you ask |
We lost much valuable manpower and skills by not allowing gays to serve in the military up until now. They can turn a wrench, fire a rifle or type on a keyboard just as well as their straight counterparts. There are certain areas where it wouldn't be wise, in my opinion, such as the battlefield, for the same reason they don't allow women into some types of combat; because it can degrade morale, some people would be uncomfortable, etc. But most of the military today is now in either a support position or working in offices. Only a small percentage fights in the traditional infantry position that comes to mind when you say 'soldier'.

I get that two people of the same gender can love each other. I really do. I just don't think it should be called marriage. Marriage is, and always has been a religious institution, and as most religions disagree with homosexuality, it will always be regarded as between a man and a woman. Call it a domestic partnership. Call it a legal union, call it whatever you want, just not marriage. I think it would have been passed a lot sooner if they hadn't stubbornly insisted on using that term.
0 comments:
Post a Comment